Meeting intelligence → decision register

The decision exists only in someone’s memory.

HUMAN STEPS
1
AUTOMATED
6
RECLAIMED
~5 hrs/month

WF-10 — Meeting intelligence → decision register. 1 human step, 6 automated steps, about 5 hours a month reclaimed.

  1. Step 1. Site meeting recorded (TEAMS). 43 minutes, four attendees
  2. Step 2. Transcribe + attribute. Who said it, not just what
  3. Step 3. Extract decisions and actions. Separates a decision from a comment
  4. Step 4. Assign to a name and a date. Never to “the team”
  5. Step 5. Flag client changes as variations. Cost consequence surfaced now
  6. Step 6. Decision register entry. Dated, attributable, exportable
  7. Step 7. Minutes issued (OUTLOOK). Within the hour

Risk points in this workflow:

  • Ambiguous decision. Flagged rather than recorded wrongly. A wrong entry in a decision register is worse than a gap.

Steps you still do:

  • Confirm the ambiguous items

What it actually does

  1. 01Site meeting recorded43 minutes, four attendees
  2. 02Transcribe + attributeWho said it, not just what
  3. 03Extract decisions and actionsSeparates a decision from a comment
  4. 04Assign to a name and a dateNever to “the team”
  5. 05Flag client changes as variationsCost consequence surfaced now
  6. 06Decision register entryDated, attributable, exportable
  7. 07Minutes issuedWithin the hour

The risk this covers

Ambiguous decision

Flagged rather than recorded wrongly. A wrong entry in a decision register is worse than a gap.

What you still do

  • Confirm the ambiguous itemsTwo minutes, not forty

Everything else runs without you.

All fifteen workflows →
WORKFLOW
WF-10
BAND
BUILD-OUT
REV
01