Meeting intelligence → decision register
The decision exists only in someone’s memory.
- HUMAN STEPS
- 1
- AUTOMATED
- 6
- RECLAIMED
- ~5 hrs/month
WF-10 — Meeting intelligence → decision register. 1 human step, 6 automated steps, about 5 hours a month reclaimed.
- Step 1. Site meeting recorded (TEAMS). 43 minutes, four attendees
- Step 2. Transcribe + attribute. Who said it, not just what
- Step 3. Extract decisions and actions. Separates a decision from a comment
- Step 4. Assign to a name and a date. Never to “the team”
- Step 5. Flag client changes as variations. Cost consequence surfaced now
- Step 6. Decision register entry. Dated, attributable, exportable
- Step 7. Minutes issued (OUTLOOK). Within the hour
Risk points in this workflow:
- Ambiguous decision. Flagged rather than recorded wrongly. A wrong entry in a decision register is worse than a gap.
Steps you still do:
- Confirm the ambiguous items
What it actually does
- 01Site meeting recorded43 minutes, four attendees
- 02Transcribe + attributeWho said it, not just what
- 03Extract decisions and actionsSeparates a decision from a comment
- 04Assign to a name and a dateNever to “the team”
- 05Flag client changes as variationsCost consequence surfaced now
- 06Decision register entryDated, attributable, exportable
- 07Minutes issuedWithin the hour
The risk this covers
Ambiguous decision
Flagged rather than recorded wrongly. A wrong entry in a decision register is worse than a gap.
What you still do
- Confirm the ambiguous itemsTwo minutes, not forty
Everything else runs without you.
- WORKFLOW
- WF-10
- BAND
- BUILD-OUT
- REV
- 01